Certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit. Ball state university, decided by the supreme court on monday, concerns an employers liability, under federal civil rights law, for sexual or racial harassment of one employee by. United states district court for the southern district of texas, alleging discrimination on account of religion and retaliation for reporting sexual harassment. 3 the district court granted fort bends motion for summary judgment. on top of that, the number of workplace sexual harassment cases skyrocketed during that decade, jump-started by news attention to anita hills testimony at clarence thomas supreme court. in 2013, the supreme courts conservatives issued a 54 decision that further limited the ability of harassment victims to vindicate their rights in court. Reliable information about the coronavirus (covid-19) is available from the world health organization (current situation, international travel). Numerous and frequently-updated resource results are available from this worldcat. Oclcs webjunction has pulled together information and resources to assist library staff as they consider how to handle coronavirus. 998 (1998), the supreme court handed down a unanimous decision holding that same sex sexual harassment is actionable under title vii of the civil rights act of 1964. In that case, which arose in louisiana, a male employee brought a sexual harassment suit against his employer and other male employees alleging thatwwhile working on an. Gebser then appealed her case to united states supreme court. She challenged the standard established by the 5th circuit because she said a school district should be liable if it received constructive notice (if the school district knew or should have known of the behavior.). On june 26, 1998, the united states supreme court issued two long-awaited decisions addressing the scope of employer liability for sexual harassment engaged in by supervisors. City of boca raton involved claims by employees that they had been subjected to a hostile work environment created by their supervisors. 57 (1986), is a us labor law case, where the united states supreme court, in a 9-0 decision, recognized sexual harassment as a violation of title vii of the civil rights act of 1964. The case was the first of its kind to reach the supreme court and would redefine sexual harassment in the workplace.